Search This Blog

Thursday, August 31, 2023

USDA modernizes oversight of child nutrition programs, including school meals - FoodNavigator-USA.com

According to the Child Nutrition Program Integrity final rule​ published in the Federal Register Aug. 23, USDA’s Food and Nutrition Services and state agencies need only review school food authorities or schools administering Child Nutrition Program services every five years – rather than every three – unless problems requiring more immediate follow-up are uncovered.

USDA argues this change, which will go into effect July 1, 2024, along with other efforts to reduce redundancies, will “free up time and resources for state agencies to more effectively perform reviews, provide technical assistance and focus on program improvement.”

It adds the three year review cycle “is taxing for state agencies and SFAs and diverts resources from technical assistance and program improvement.”

Most stakeholders who commented on the proposed change agreed the shift would allow them to better balance resources and support schools, and they added a risk-based approach for identifying follow-up reviews would ensure sufficient oversight.

FNS will further lighten the administrative burden associated with audits by allowing state agencies with FNS approval to substitute information from local-level audits for related parts of the administrative review – effectively reducing unnecessary duplication of efforts without compromising program integrity.

Likewise, state agencies will be able to omit specific, redundant areas of administrative review who sufficient oversight is conducted elsewhere, according to the rule.

Some of the cost-savings associated with these changes will be earmarked to process improvements to reduce or eliminate program errors that are harder to identify with routine monitoring, according to the final rule.

Stakeholders’ reaction to this provision was mixed with many asking for additional clarification to which FNS agreed to develop additional guidance and process reforms.

Beyond adding flexibility to the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs, the final rule also codifies provisions in the Child and Adult Care Food Programs to increase accountability, allow for more frequent oversight of CACFP participants and enhance enforcement capabilities of FNS and state agencies in the rare instances of severe and repeated violations.

Adblock test (Why?)



from "nutrition" - Google News https://ift.tt/gxcQt7j
via IFTTT

USDA modernizes oversight of child nutrition programs, including school meals - FoodNavigator-USA.com

According to the Child Nutrition Program Integrity final rule​ published in the Federal Register Aug. 23, USDA’s Food and Nutrition Services and state agencies need only review school food authorities or schools administering Child Nutrition Program services every five years – rather than every three – unless problems requiring more immediate follow-up are uncovered.

USDA argues this change, which will go into effect July 1, 2024, along with other efforts to reduce redundancies, will “free up time and resources for state agencies to more effectively perform reviews, provide technical assistance and focus on program improvement.”

It adds the three year review cycle “is taxing for state agencies and SFAs and diverts resources from technical assistance and program improvement.”

Most stakeholders who commented on the proposed change agreed the shift would allow them to better balance resources and support schools, and they added a risk-based approach for identifying follow-up reviews would ensure sufficient oversight.

FNS will further lighten the administrative burden associated with audits by allowing state agencies with FNS approval to substitute information from local-level audits for related parts of the administrative review – effectively reducing unnecessary duplication of efforts without compromising program integrity.

Likewise, state agencies will be able to omit specific, redundant areas of administrative review who sufficient oversight is conducted elsewhere, according to the rule.

Some of the cost-savings associated with these changes will be earmarked to process improvements to reduce or eliminate program errors that are harder to identify with routine monitoring, according to the final rule.

Stakeholders’ reaction to this provision was mixed with many asking for additional clarification to which FNS agreed to develop additional guidance and process reforms.

Beyond adding flexibility to the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs, the final rule also codifies provisions in the Child and Adult Care Food Programs to increase accountability, allow for more frequent oversight of CACFP participants and enhance enforcement capabilities of FNS and state agencies in the rare instances of severe and repeated violations.

Adblock test (Why?)



from "nutrition" - Google News https://ift.tt/gxcQt7j
via IFTTT

Good nutrition and food intake slashes risk of contracting tuberculosis, shows research from India - Scroll.in

For centuries, we have known that tuberculosis is a social disease. It thrives on poverty and social factors such as malnutrition, poor housing, overcrowding, unsafe work environments and stigma.

Globally in 2021 an estimated 2.2 million cases of TB were attributable to undernourishment, 0.86 million to HIV infection, 0.74 million to alcohol use disorders, 0.69 million to smoking and 0.37 million to diabetes.

But knowledge about social determinants alone does not always translate into tangible action and progress. A new trial in India, called RATIONS, aimed to determine the effect of nutritional supplementation on new cases of tuberculosis in households of adults with pulmonary TB. The research found that providing food baskets to people with TB and their households could go a long way to prevent and mitigate the disease.

No easy silver bullets

The TB community has typically looked for biomedical solutions, or “silver bullets”, for a social pathology, and we are struggling to make progress.

Since the Covid-19 pandemic, TB mortality and incidence have increased globally, putting TB back on top as the single most deadly infectious killer of humankind.

In 2021, 1.6 million people died of TB. In Africa, TB incidence is high (212 per 100,000 population) with a high case fatality rate because of the HIV epidemic.

Undernutrition is the most important cause of TB. This has been shown in studies in many countries, including South Africa, where researchers found poor levels of nutrition in patients admitted to a specialised TB hospital.

Malnutrition refers to all forms of deficiencies in nutrition, including over-nutrition and obesity. Undernutrition refers more specifically to a deficiency of nutrients.

While we know that many patients with TB have poor nutrition, the latest evidence is that undernutrition also plays a key role in TB within households.

The results of the Reducing Activation of Tuberculosis by Improvement of Nutritional Status (RATIONS) trial show that improved nutrition in family members of patients with lung TB reduced all forms of TB by nearly 40%, and infectious TB by nearly 50%.

This trial recruited 10,345 household members of 2,800 patients with lung TB.

  • All TB patients received a monthly 10kg food basket (rice, pulses, milk powder, oil) and multivitamins for six months.
  • In one group family members received 5kg rice and 1.5kg pulses per person per month, while the other group of family members did not get food baskets.

Food worked like a vaccine in this trial, cutting the risk of household members developing TB.

Nutrition could also protect against other conditions such as anaemia, diarrhoea and respiratory infections, but these were not not the main focus of the trial.

An accompanying paper, based on the results of the RATIONS trial, showed that severe undernutrition was present in nearly half of all patients.

An early weight gain in the first two months was associated with 60% lower risk of TB mortality. The other benefits were higher treatment success and better weight gain. During the six-month follow-up period, a remarkable treatment success rate of 94% was achieved.

Getting food to patients

How expensive was the intervention? The cost of a food basket was US$13 per TB patient per month and US$4 per household member per month and could be delivered, even in rural areas, using field staff.

Even before the RATIONS trial, the Indian government had recognised the need for nutrition support for people with TB, and in 2018 launched “Nikshay Poshan Yojana”, a direct benefit transfer scheme. Under this scheme, each TB patient receives a financial incentive of US$6 per month for the duration of the anti-TB treatment (typically, six months for people with drug-sensitive TB).

Emerging data suggests that while the scheme improves the treatment completion rates among patients with TB in India, they often receive their payments late. There is a need to improve the efficiency and provide timely payments.

The new RATIONS trial suggests that directly providing food baskets may be another effective strategy.

Many countries, including India, have other social security programmes, including public distribution systems to provide food grains at subsidised prices. Using existing channels to provide extra food rations to people with TB, and expanding the menu to include proteins such as pulses and millets, is a strategy worth exploring. This could also have positive effects on other diseases such as diabetes.

Implications for South Africa

South Africa is one of the countries labelled by the World Health Organization as a “high TB burden country”.

What does this latest research mean for South Africa? Statistics South Africa reported that in 2021 2.6 million people had inadequate access to food and a further 1.1 million stated they had “severe” inadequate access to food. More than 683,000 children five years and younger experienced hunger.

This toxic mix requires prevention of TB by nutritional support, drugs to prevent TB infections and early diagnosis with molecular tests and treatment.

With high levels of food insecurity and undernutrition in South Africa, fuelled by the highest levels of inequality, it is critical that South Africa includes social benefits for people with TB and those in their households to reduce the prevalence of TB in the country and to meet the Sustainable Development Goals for 2030.

Regardless of how social benefits are distributed, action must be based on evidence. We need better tests, cures and vaccines for TB, but they alone cannot end the epidemic.

TB patients must be provided with the social benefits that they need and deserve, as a basic human right.

Yogan Pillay is Extraordinary Professor in the Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Stellenbosch University.

Madhukar Pai is Director of Global Health & Professor, McGill University.

This article was first published on The Conversation.

Adblock test (Why?)



from "nutrition" - Google News https://ift.tt/KhXqVGi
via IFTTT

Behavior Is a Miracle Drug for Our Health - TIME

Healthcare is broken. Chronic diseases are eating up an increasing share of healthcare resources in every healthcare system across the world in ways that are not sustainable. Yes, there is a golden age of innovation happening in the form of new technologies like gene therapy, neural technology, immunotherapy, and increasingly the impact of AI on diagnoses and drug development, but we can’t let these extraordinary technological advances blind us to the tragedy of modern healthcare and to the much neglected miracle drug right in front of us: our daily behaviors. Whether for preventing disease or optimizing the treatment of disease, behavior is indeed a miracle drug.

There are five foundational daily behaviors that, together, make up this miracle drug: sleep, food, movement, stress management, and connection. Because the science is clear that when we improve these daily aspects of our lives, dramatic improvements in our health and well-being follow. The breakthroughs this can bring in our health aren’t over the horizon—they’re here right now.

What’s clear is that what we’re doing right now isn’t working. According to the World Health Organization, chronic and noncommunicable diseases, like heart disease, diabetes, and respiratory diseases, kill 41 million people each year. At the current rate, by 2050, chronic diseases will be responsible for 86% of the 90 million deaths each year, an astounding 90% increase in raw numbers just since 2019. Worldwide, over 500 million people are living with diabetes, and that number is expected to rise to 783 million by 2045. By 2040, the International Diabetes Foundation predicts that spending on diabetes could exceed $800 billion a year. “The most heart-rending symbol of America’s failure in healthcare,” writes Nicholas Kristof in The New York Times, “is the avoidable amputations that result from poorly managed diabetes… A toe, foot or leg is cut off by a doctor about 150,000 times a year in America.”

There’s no healthcare system in the world successfully managing health outcomes against this onslaught of chronic diseases. Whether it’s single payer, nationalized healthcare or systems based on private insurance, all healthcare systems are losing the battle. In the U.S., around 90% of our $3.8 trillion in healthcare spending goes toward the treatment of chronic and mental health conditions. From 1960 to 2021, U.S. healthcare costs soared from 5% to 18% of GDP. In the UK, the list of those waiting to receive medical care has reached 7.47 million. Clearly it’s not just a failure of prevention—our healthcare systems are even failing at the narrower goal of delivering adequate sick care.

The potential to reverse these trendlines can be found in the data: Medical care accounts only for an estimated 10% to 20% of health outcomes, while our daily behaviors drive 36% of outcomes. What does that add up to in terms of our health? According to the UN, the combination of maintaining a healthy weight, regular exercise, a healthy diet and not smoking can reduce the risk of developing the most common and deadly chronic diseases by as much as 80%. The dramatic decline of smoking in America in the last two decades and the impact this has had on health is one example of what’s possible.

Both our lifespan and our healthspan—the period of time in which we’re not just alive but healthy and enjoying a good quality of life—are hugely influenced by our lifestyle. Harvard economist Raj Chetty has found that behaviors such as eating habits, exercise, and smoking affect our life expectancy even more than access to healthcare. In other words, how long we live and how well we live are in large part governed by the choices we make each day. To truly change healthcare, along with the power of life-saving drugs and technologies, we must focus on the power of life-transforming habits within each of these foundational behaviors. Because while healthcare is episodic, health itself is continuous. Health is what happens between doctor visits.

A study in the journal Circulation gives us a vivid look at how powerful behavior can be. Researchers found that people who, at age 50, were practicing five healthy habits—exercising regularly, eating healthy, not smoking, maintaining healthy weight, and not drinking excessive alcohol—added over a decade to their lives (14 years for women and 12.2 years for men). “The main take-home message is that there’s huge gains in health and longevity to be had just by simple changes in our behavior pattern,” said study co-author and Harvard Medical School professor Dr. Meir Stampfer.

So why is the power of behavior change so overlooked? Some dismiss it because they think it’s too soft—how can something like behavior change be in the same category as technological advances and new diagnostic tools? Others give up on behavior change because it’s too hard—it’s the doctor telling us to eat our broccoli and go to the gym. Eating healthier and getting some exercise are things most of us know we should do, but simply being told to do them doesn’t set us up for success.

For the first objection, it’s not either-or. Of course, behavior change isn’t a substitute for drugs and medical treatment, but there’s a ton of hard science showing that it’s an essential companion that optimizes the management of disease. For instance, a study by researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center found that getting good sleep can increase rates of survival for breast cancer patients. “Sleep is certainly something that is controllable,” said epidemiologist and lead author Dr. Amanda Phipps. “We have control over it more than family history of the disease. These results generally suggest that the more attention we give to sleep as an important aspect of overall health, the better we might do for breast cancer patients.” Studies have also found that chronic stress increases the growth of cancer cells. And exercise can reverse stiffness in the heart associated with a condition called left ventricular hypertrophy. All five of our foundational daily behaviors deeply impact how effective medical treatment will be.

And for the second objection—yes, behavior change is hard. But here, too, the science shows that behavior change is absolutely possible when it’s done right. Behavioral science has a long history. Our habits are not formed in a vacuum, and there are certain conditions and strategies that make behavior change much more likely to succeed.

One of those proven strategies is to start as small as possible, which is why Thrive’s behavior change platform is based on Microsteps—too-small-to-fail steps you can take to immediately begin improving your life. Not only is behavior change possible, but it’s going to get easier and more effective with the rise of AI, which Thrive is using to give people real-time nudges and personalized Microsteps in their life flow when they need them most.

Along with Microsteps, other proven strategies are storytelling, compelling content, and community that engages, inspires, motivates and supports people to take charge of their own health and move from awareness to action. This is the scientific methodology that makes behavior change not only achievable but sustainable. We’ve seen the dramatic results that starting off with small Microsteps can have in the lives of employees at the companies we work with around the world.

For instance, there’s Pele Mase, a Walmart associate who lives in Tulsa. She started with a single Microstep of drinking water instead of soda, and progressed to Microsteps around her food, movement, and stress management until she lost 100 pounds.

And there’s Jerry Ouellette, a director of network services for AT&T. After his doctor told him at his annual checkup that he was pre-diabetic, Ouellette started with the goal of walking one mile a day, and then worked his way up to five: “I’ve lost 32 pounds, my sleep apnea is gone, I feel great and I’m getting ready for my annual wellness check and I expect my doctor is going to give me a lot better news. It’s been a great journey.”

Of course, there are chronic systemic health inequities that make it much harder for people to live healthy lives—food deserts, violent neighborhoods, housing instability, lack of access to healthcare —and we should be relentlessly focused on fixing those, both at the policy and at the community levels. But again it’s not either-or. While we are working to improve the social determinants of health, people don’t have the luxury to continue to ignore the impact of behavioral determinants of health—taking small steps to reduce their suffering and improve their lives and the lives of their children. That also means taking advantage of modern digital solutions, like Instacart’s availability to 93% of people living in food deserts. These steps cannot wait until systemic problems have been solved. Too many lives are at stake.

People are hungry for help and support in managing their health. A recent survey by CharityRx found that 65% of Americans turn to Google for health advice—but only 40% find online health information reliable. What makes this moment so exciting is that this growing focus on behavior change is happening at the same time that new powerful technologies—like AI, personalized digital tools and wearables—are emerging to support real and lasting behavior change.

Yes, we can look forward to new medical breakthroughs, and we should celebrate them when they happen. But if we’re truly going to move the needle on chronic diseases, we also need the miracle drug of daily behaviors.

More Must-Reads From TIME

Adblock test (Why?)



from "healthy life" - Google News https://ift.tt/bABv7xJ
via IFTTT

Wednesday, August 30, 2023

USDA Scientists Build a Healthy Diet With 91% of Calories Coming From Ultra-Processed Foods - SciTechDaily

Woman Shopping Processed Food Supermarket

A recent study led by the USDA Agricultural Research Service’s Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center has shown that it’s possible to construct a healthy diet with up to 91% of calories coming from ultra-processed foods, according to the NOVA scale, and still meet the recommendations from the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA).

Scientists from the USDA’s Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center demonstrated a healthy diet could comprise up to 91% ultra-processed foods, in line with 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, although future research will assess potential adverse health effects.

Scientists at the USDA Agricultural Research Service’s (ARS) Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center led a study that demonstrates it is possible to build a healthy diet with 91% of the calories coming from ultra-processed foods (as classified using the NOVA scale) while still following the recommendations from the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA). The study highlights the versatility of using DGA recommendations in constructing healthy menus.

“The study is a proof-of-concept that shows a more balanced view of healthy eating patterns, where using ultra-processed foods can be an option,” said ARS Research Nutritionist Julie Hess at the Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center. “According to current dietary recommendations, the nutrient content of a food and its place in a food group are more important than the extent to which a food was processed.”

Understanding the NOVA Scale

In the study, scientists used the NOVA scale to determine which foods to classify as ultra-processed. The NOVA scale first appeared in literature in 2009 and is the most commonly used scale in nutrition science to classify foods by degree of processing.

According to the NOVA scale, foods can be classified into four groups depending on their degree of processing:

  1. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods.
  2. Processed culinary ingredients.
  3. Processed foods.
  4. Ultra-processed foods.

Experiment Details

To test if ultra-processed foods can be used to build a healthy diet, ARS scientists and collaborators created a menu with breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks using MyPyramid as a guide for a seven-day, 2,000-calorie food pattern The menu consisted of foods categorized as ultra-processed by at least two NOVA graders. The foods included in the menu also aligned with 2020 DGA recommendations for servings of groups and subgroups of fruits, vegetables, grains, protein foods, and dairy.

Scientists selected food products that have lower levels of saturated fats and added sugars while still containing enough micronutrients and macronutrients. Some of the ultra-processed foods used in this menu included canned beans, instant oatmeal, ultra-filtered milk, whole wheat bread, and dried fruit.

“We used the Healthy Eating Index to assess the quality of the diet as it aligns with key DGA recommendations,” said Hess. “The menu we developed scored 86 of 100 points on the Healthy Eating Index-2015, meeting most of the thresholds, except for sodium content [exceeded recommendations] and whole grains [below recommendations].”

Future Research Directions

While this study has provided valuable insights, more work is on the horizon. Scientists aim to delve deeper into the subject, acknowledging that some observational research studies indicate that ultra-processed products could be associated with adverse health outcomes.

This research shows that there is a role for a variety of foods when building a healthy diet and that more research is needed in this field, especially intervention studies.

Details of the study were published in The Journal of Nutrition.

Reference: “Dietary Guidelines Meet NOVA: Developing a Menu for A Healthy Dietary Pattern Using Ultra-Processed Foods” by Julie M. Hess, Madeline E. Comeau, Shanon Casperson, Joanne L. Slavin, Guy H. Johnson, Mark Messina, Susan Raatz, Angela J. Scheett, Anne Bodensteiner and Daniel G. Palmer, 24 June 2023, The Journal of Nutrition.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.06.028

Authors of the study are Julie M. Hess (USDA-ARS), Madeline E. Comeau (USDA-ARS), Shanon Casperson (USDA-ARS), Joanne L. Slavin (University of Minnesota), Guy H. Johnson (Johnson Nutrition Solutions, LLC), Mark Messina (Soy Nutrition Institute Global), Susan Raatz (University of Minnesota), Angela J. Scheett (USDA-ARS), Anne Bodensteiner (University of North Dakota), Daniel G. Palmer (USDA-ARS).

Adblock test (Why?)



from "nutrition" - Google News https://ift.tt/M5QYg8h
via IFTTT

Are Smoothies Healthy? How Blending Affects Nutrients - The New York Times

Q: If I blend fruits and vegetables into a smoothie, do they lose nutrients or fiber?

A freshly blended smoothie ticks a lot of boxes: It’s quick to prepare, easy to consume and a versatile base for whatever fruits and veggies you have on hand.

And if blending your produce can help you eat more of it, that’s a good thing, said Kristina Petersen, an associate professor of nutritional sciences at Pennsylvania State University. According to surveys performed between 2017 and 2018, 86 percent of adults in the United States didn’t get the recommended 4.5 cups of fruits and vegetables each day.

But are nutrients lost when fruits and vegetables are chopped into bits by a blender blade? We asked experts to help us break it down so you can get the most out of your smoothie.

Unlike juicing, blending can incorporate all of the edible parts of fruits and vegetables — including the skin, seeds and pulp — so a smoothie can be nutritionally very similar to eating the produce whole, said Mary Ann Lila, a professor of food, bioprocessing and nutrition sciences at North Carolina State University.

And blending shouldn’t degrade the vitamins or minerals found in fruits and vegetables, Dr. Lila said. Nor will it immediately harm certain antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds, like anthocyanins and flavonols, she said.

Fruits and vegetables are also good sources of fiber, which most of us could benefit from eating more of. And whether you eat an apple whole or as part of a smoothie, “you’ve consumed exactly the same amount of fiber,” said Balazs Bajka, a gut physiologist at King’s College London.

Blending does, however, break the fibers into smaller pieces, which will affect how they move through your digestive system, he said. Some types of fibers, when chopped into bits, may disperse more quickly within your gut and slow digestion and absorption — usually a good thing — while others might lose some of the “roughage” effect that keeps things moving in your digestive tract and prevents constipation.

But there’s not much research on this topic, Dr. Bajka said, and specific effects may depend on the person and the fruit or vegetable. Regardless, “eating any kind of fiber is good,” he said.

Processing food often disrupts its natural structure, which can lead to faster digestion and absorption. So it’s reasonable to wonder if puréeing fruit could cause a bigger spike of blood sugar, said Anthony Fardet, a nutrition scientist at the National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment in France.

But in a few small studies that measured adults’ blood sugars after they consumed fruit blended or whole, researchers have found reassuring results. The preparation style of mango, for instance, seemed to make no difference in blood sugar response. And when researchers tested smoothies containing seeded fruits like passion fruit, raspberries or kiwi fruit, participants had more gradual rises in blood sugars than when they ate the same fruits whole.

That result surprised Gail Rees, a senior lecturer in human nutrition at the University of Plymouth in Britain who led two of the studies. She hypothesized that mashing up the fruits’ seeds in the blender might release some fiber, protein and fat, which could slow nutrient absorption and cause a more gradual rise in blood sugars.

That said, liquid meals are generally less satiating than those composed of solid foods, Dr. Fardet said — it’s not clear why this is, but it may result in a desire to consume more, or it may leave you hungry for a snack sooner.

Beyond the fruits and vegetables you use in your smoothies, other ingredients also affect their nutritional value, Dr. Petersen said. Water is a good liquid base if you’re aiming for a light snack. For a more balanced and filling smoothie, low-fat or fat-free dairy milk or unsweetened yogurt, kefir or fortified plant-based milks can provide protein, calcium and vitamin D, she added.

“Throw some nuts in there,” or avocado, Dr. Lila suggested. Both provide healthy fats and fiber, as do chia or flax seeds; whole grains like millet or rolled oats are good fiber sources, too.

Smoothies also provide a great opportunity to use frozen produce, which is generally just as nutritious as when it is fresh, Dr. Lila said. She recommended storing frozen fruits and vegetables at the back of your freezer to minimize the slight thawing and refreezing that can cause nutrient losses when you open your freezer door.

Finally, keep in mind that once fruit is blended, its healthful compounds gradually become less stable, Dr. Lila said. Yesterday’s smoothie that has separated and turned a bit gray has probably lost some of its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory value, she said. For the same reason, prepackaged smoothies may not be as beneficial, she added, and they also often contain added sugars.

In other words, Dr. Lila said, enjoy your smoothie — but make it fresh and drink it right away.

Adblock test (Why?)



from "nutrition" - Google News https://ift.tt/e1gZ7ID
via IFTTT

Tuesday, August 29, 2023

The top 10 nutrition myths, debunked by experts - Deseret News

Maintaining a nutritious diet can be challenging, especially when it feels like the rules are always changing. Is organic produce healthier than conventional? Do carbs make you gain weight? Does fruit have too much sugar? It can be difficult to keep up.

There are several longstanding nutritional myths many of us have fallen prey to. We are here to tell you: it is healthy to eat carbs, real sugar is better than sweeteners and there are other myths to debunk about what makes a “healthy” diet.

Here are 10 nutrition myths, debunked by experts.

Myth 1: To lose weight, avoid carbs

Eliminating carbs from your diet will not guarantee weight loss, carbs are essential to a healthy, balanced diet and they boast several nutritional benefits.

“I have good news for all you carb lovers. ... Carbs are your friend, and in fact they’re a really important part of a healthy, balanced diet,” Nora Minno, a registered dietitian and certified nutritionist told Today. “They’re our body’s (and brain’s) preferred source of fuel, they help our digestion and they just make us feel good.”

There many healthy sources of carbs, some of the healthiest sources include: unprocessed or minimally processed whole grains, fruits, vegetables and beans, reports the Harvard School of Public Health.

There are also unhealthier sources of carbs such as: white bread, soda, pastries and other highly-processed foods. These are the sorts of carbs that can contribute to weight gain.

The Mayo Clinic recommends adults eat between 225 and 325 grams of carbs every day. For reference, a medium apple contains about 25 grams of carbohydrates whereas two slices of white bread contain roughly 26 grams of carbohydrates.

Myth 2: Fresh fruits and vegetables are better than canned or frozen

Fresh, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables all share the same nutritional benefits, research shows. The only difference? Canned and frozen fruits and vegetables typically cost less.

A 2014 study examined the nutrition found in fruits and vegetables across different packaging methods (fresh, canned, frozen) relative to average price.

“The evidence from this study suggests that fruits and vegetables packaged as frozen or canned are cost-effective and nutritious options for meeting daily vegetable and fruit recommendations in the context of a healthy diet,” researchers claim.

Frozen or canned fruits and vegetables are usually packaged quickly, so they retain their nutritional value, reports Healthline. During times where fresh fruit and vegetables are not in season, canned and frozen make a perfectly nutritious alternative.

Myth 3: Plant-based milk is healthier than dairy milk

Research shows that cow’s milk is actually more nutrient-dense that plant-based milks such as oat or soy milks. Cow’s milk offers a better source calcium, vitamin D and protein, reports Insider.

“This one really comes down to preference,” Nora Minno, a registered dietitian and certified nutritionist told Today. “One cup of skim milk packs in 10 grams of protein and a quarter of your daily calcium needs, whereas plant milk, such as almond milk, has one gram of protein per serving.”

Keep in mind, if you suffer from lactose intolerance, plant-based milks still offer nutritional benefits.

“There’s really no downside to drinking plant-based milk instead of cow’s milk,” says Dana Ellis Hunnes, PhD, MPH, UCLA Health senior dietitian. “Although milk is only one small part of a person’s diet, plant-based milk along with a plant-forward diet offers many benefits for your health.”

Myth 4: A glass of red wine is good for your heart

It’s a common misconception that red wine, in moderation, is good for your heart. There is no reason to start drinking red wine in hopes that it will benefit your heart health.

Studies have shown a relationship between drinking moderate amounts of red wine and good heart health, but no research has found a cause-and-effect link between red wine consumption and improved heart health, per the American Heart Association.

There is likely another factor at play that accounts for the relationship between red wine consumption and better heart health.

“It might be that wine drinkers are more likely to have a healthier lifestyle and a healthier diet such as the Mediterranean diet, which is known to be cardioprotective,” Dr. Robert Kloner, chief science officer and director of cardiovascular research at Huntington Medical Research Institutes and a professor of medicine at the University of Southern California, told the American Heart Association.

“Alcohol in excess is really bad for the heart,” Kloner added. “It can cause high blood pressure and promote arrhythmias. It can cause cardiomyopathy where the alcohol is actually toxic to the heart muscle cells, and that can lead to heart failure.”

Myth 5: Soy-based foods increase risk of breast cancer

Researchers once thought that eating soy-based foods could increase the risk of breast cancer and other cancers. This theory has since been debunked. Eating moderate amounts of soy foods does not increase risk of breast cancer, reports the Mayo Clinic.

Isoflavones, which are found in soy, are plant estrogens. High estrogen levels has been linked to an increased risk of breast cancer, but plant estrogens are different and come with no real threat.

“We know that estrogen can sometimes be linked to an increase in breast cancer, but the estrogens in soy are very different than mammalian estrogens, the ones we have in our body,” Nora Minno, a registered dietitian and certified nutritionist told Today “They can actually be protective against things like breast cancer because what we’ve seen in Asian countries where they consume more soy is that breast cancer risk is actually much lower.”

Myth 6: Organic produce is healthier

The most important part of a healthy diet it that it is balanced. Daily consumption of fruits and vegetables is essential to achieving a balanced diet, according to the CDC.

Organic produce has fewer synthetic pesticides and fertilizers but is also costs a lot more. Additionally, there are no proven nutritional benefits to eating strictly organic produce.

“There’ve been a number of studies examining the macro- and micronutrient content, but whether organically or conventionally grown, the foods are really similar for vitamins, minerals, and carbohydrates,”  says registered dietitian Kathy McManus, director of the Department of Nutrition at Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women’s Hospital, per Harvard Health.

“I don’t see any nutritional reasons to choose organic foods over conventional,” McManus added.

Myth 7: High-cholesterol foods are bad for you

Cholesterol levels have a lot more to do with genetics than diet — eating cholesterol-rich foods such as eggs might not actually impact the levels of cholesterol in your blood.

“Your genetic makeup – not diet – is the driving force behind cholesterol levels” says Dr. Steven Nissen, per the Cleveland Clinic. “The body creates cholesterol in amounts much larger than what you can eat, so avoiding foods that are high in cholesterol won’t affect your blood cholesterol levels very much.”

High levels of cholesterol in the blood stream has been linked the heart disease, but roughly 85% of the cholesterol circulating through your body is created in the liver. A family history of heart disease prevents much great risker than diet, per the Cleveland Clinic.

Myth 8: Smoothies and juices are always healthy

Certain smoothies and juices are nutritious. But most store-bought smoothies and juices are packed with sugar and calories.

“Just because there’s a leafy green in it doesn’t make it low-calorie,” Sarah B. Krieger, a registered and licensed dietitian nutritionist told the New York Times. “There’s a fine line between a smoothie and a milkshake.” 

A medium Hulk Vanilla smoothie from Smoothie King is made with butter pecan ice cream and more than 1,000 calories.

Many store-bought smoothies don’t actually contain fresh fruit in them either. The McDonald’s Strawberry Banana Smoothie is made with a strawberry banana “fruit base.”

Checking ingredients is essential when searching for a healthy store-bought smoothie or juice.

Myth 9: Low calorie, non-nutritive sweeteners are healthy

Artificial sweeteners like Splenda, Stevia, Truiva and Equal are often used as an alternative for real sugar, but recent, updated guidelines from the World Health Organization discourage using non-sugar sweeteners for weight control.

“Replacing free sugars with NSS (non-sugar sweeteners) does not help with weight control in the long term. People need to consider other ways to reduce free sugars intake, such as consuming food with naturally occurring sugars, like fruit, or unsweetened food and beverages,” says Francesco Branca, WHO Director for Nutrition and Food Safety. “NSS are not essential dietary factors and have no nutritional value. People should reduce the sweetness of the diet altogether, starting early in life, to improve their health.”

Myth 10: Avoid eating gluten

Gluten is a protein found in wheat, barley and rye. For those who suffer from Celiac Disease, an autoimmune disease, consuming gluten can be detrimental to their health. But if you do not have Celiac Disease or gluten sensitivity, there is no nutritional benefit to cutting gluten out, per Johns Hopkins Medicine.

“If you cut all gluten out of your diet, there’s a risk that you could miss out on nutritious whole grains, fiber and micronutrients,” reports Johns Hopkins Medicine. “Getting enough whole grains in your diet is especially important if you’re at risk for heart disease or diabetes. Whole grains can lower cholesterol levels and even help regulate your blood sugar.”

“In addition, some gluten-containing foods are sources of important vitamins and minerals, such as B vitamins, iron and magnesium.”

Adblock test (Why?)



from "nutrition" - Google News https://ift.tt/upyJl4h
via IFTTT

How to help your pet live a long & healthy life - NBC New York

Idaho's vision: Healthy people living and thriving in safe, healthy ... - Idaho Department of Health and Welfare

Imagine a world where everyone has an opportunity to live their healthiest life, whether they live in a rural, frontier, or urban area, and regardless of their income. This is the essence of health equity in Idaho – making sure that every person has a fair and impartial chance to be as healthy as possible.

For the Idaho Division of Public Health, health equity is not just a policy, it's a vision that drives us to start and nurture prevention-focused solutions that build and support Idaho communities where everyone has a fair chance at their best health and well-being. We’re focused on giving these communities a hand up.

What is health equity?

Health equity is all about making sure that every person has the same opportunities to achieve an optimal quality of life that accounts for any health issues including mental health. Imagine if everyone had an equal chance at living their healthiest, happiest lives. That's the goal of health equity and is the foundation Idaho Public Health is built on!

Why does it matter?

Different people face different challenges (many outside of their control) when it comes to living a healthy life. A one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t work for all communities in Idaho. The issues that make the healthy choice the hard choice are specific.

Where you are born and live, work, and play makes a difference in how healthy you are in Idaho. Your ZIP code is a better predictor of health and longevity than your genetics.

Racial and ethnic diversity also plays a role and has increased in Idaho over the past decade. Idaho is home to five federally recognized tribes, as well as an increasing Hispanic or Latino population and people from other states, countries, and cultures.

Many Idahoans live in areas with limited healthcare facilities, making it harder for them to see a doctor or a dentist. Some Idahoans don’t have much money to spend on nutritious food, exercise equipment or gym memberships, or have the resources or time to participate in sports clubs and after-school activities. Many live in communities with no sidewalks, bike lanes, or other types of physical structures or spaces like parks that make it safe to take a walk, go for a run, or ride a bike. And even more live in communities without public transportation, which makes it harder to go to the grocery store or to medical appointments.

Factors like income, education, housing, access to healthy food, transportation, and quality healthcare are interconnected and play an important role in how healthy we are. This concept is especially relevant here because Idaho is one of the most rural states in the nation. More people live in rural or frontier areas than in cities in our state, making some of these issues even more challenging.

Mapping life expectancy by these different areas shows staggering differences of up to 20 years between the areas with the highest and lowest life expectancies across the state. This shows that your neighborhood can be a powerful factor in health and opportunity.

Idahoans are wonderfully diverse and come from different backgrounds and experiences and have different challenges, but we all deserve the opportunity to live our healthiest lives.

By considering socio-economic, demographic, geographic, and other related issues that make it hard to make a healthy choice, Idaho is working toward creating a healthier future. The goal is to make the HEALTHY choice the EASY choice for everyone.

Elke Shaw-Tulloch is the administrator of the Division of Public Health, and the state’s public health officer. She has worked for the department since 1996 and was promoted to division administrator in 2012.

The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare is dedicated to strengthening the health, safety, and independence of Idahoans. Learn more at healthandwelfare.idaho.gov. 

Adblock test (Why?)



from "healthy life" - Google News https://ift.tt/8anl7M1
via IFTTT

Yeast studies show that diet in early life matters for lifelong health - Science Daily

Researchers at the Babraham Institute are proposing an alternative link between diet and ageing based on studies in yeast. Dr Jon Houseley and his team have published their experiments, showing that healthy ageing is achievable through dietary change without restriction by potentially optimising diet, and that ill-health is not an inevitable part of the ageing process.

Scientists have long known that caloric restriction -- intentionally consuming far less calories than normal without becoming malnourished -- improves health in later life and may even extend life. However, studies in mice show that caloric restriction really needs to be maintained throughout life to achieve this impact, and the health benefits disappear when a normal diet is resumed. Dr Houseley's new research conducted in yeast suggests an alternative to calorie restriction can lead to improved health through the lifecycle.

"We show that diet in early life can switch yeast onto a healthier trajectory. By giving yeast a different diet without restricting calories we were able to suppress senescence, when cells no longer divide, and loss of fitness in aged cells." Said Dr Dorottya Horkai, lead researcher on the study.

Rather than growing yeast on their usual glucose-rich diet, the researchers swapped their diet to galactose and observed that many molecular changes which normally accompany ageing did not occur. The cells grown on galactose remained just as fit as young cells even late in life, despite not living any longer, showing that the period of ill-health towards the end of life was dramatically reduced.

"Crucially, the dietary change only works when cells are young, and actually diet makes little difference in old yeast. It is hard to translate what youth means between yeast and humans, but all these studies point to the same trend -- to live a long and healthy life, a healthy diet from an early age makes a difference." explains Dr Houseley.

Yeast are good model organisms for studying ageing as they share many of the same cellular machinery as animals and humans. This avenue of research in yeast helps us to seek a more achievable way to improve healthy ageing though diet compared to sustained and severe calorie restriction, although more research is needed.

Adblock test (Why?)



from "healthy life" - Google News https://ift.tt/S45KXZJ
via IFTTT

How do popular dietary trends impact athletic performance? - News-Medical.Net

For the optimum performance of athletes, nutrition is of utmost importance. Research has led to the development of numerous diet patterns and many of these have also been endorsed by professional athletes. A recent Nutrients study critically evaluated the existing research on diets and their impacts on athletic performance.

Popular Dietary Trends’ Impact on Athletic Performance: A Critical Analysis Review
Study: Popular Dietary Trends’ Impact on Athletic Performance: A Critical Analysis Review. Image Credit: Chinnapong/Shutterstock.com

Background

Nutrition is key for the optimum performance and recovery of athletes. The American College of Sports Medicine, American Dietetic Association, and Dietitians of Canada recommend combinations of foods and fluids that supply athletes with ample nourishment and energy to maintain their high-intensity training and recovery.

Athletes of all levels, from youth to professional, are being exposed to an array of diet patterns and nutrition through social media, peers, and coaches. The most frequently researched diets include the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet), low-carbohydrate and ketogenic diets, intermittent fasting, and vegetarian and plant-based diets. 

About the study

The current study critically analyzed the current literature on the above-mentioned diets. More specifically, it described the content of the diet, feasibility for adherence, potential drawbacks, and impact on sports performance.

It must be noted that the current study focussed on the five most common dietary patterns studied in the literature from the PubMed search and does not comprehensively discuss all diets and their impacts on athletic performance.

Narrative and systematic reviews and meta-analyses from 2015–2022 were first considered. Subsequently, the primary literature cited within these works was also studied.

Key findings

The MedDiet has been recommended from a performance and body composition standpoint. It has a low inflammatory index and provides the required nutritional support. The MedDiet supports training and performance gains while promoting weight loss if required.

Athletes adhering to the MedDiet have observed gains in aerobic and anaerobic performance, which suggests that it is beneficial for power and endurance athletes. Owing to the improvement in body composition, athletes can sustain performance during long training or competitions. Given the wide range of foods within the MedDiet, adherence is relatively easier compared to other diets.

A ketogenic diet (KD) is high In fat, very low in carbohydrates, and moderate in protein. Existing literature suggests that KD has little impact on maximum aerobic capacity. It must be noted that athletes adhering to KD may experience performance decrements in strength training because they do not meet daily caloric needs and may have reduced muscle mass.

KD has also been seen to impact bone health in endurance athletes negatively. During intense training periods and especially for endurance athletes, it is generally advised to avoid chronic carbohydrate restriction. Also, given the strict carbohydrate percentage cut-offs, adherence to KD is quite difficult.

An alternative to the KD is the non-ketogenic low-carbohydrate diets, which include KD but are more liberal on carbohydrate intake. Overall, such low-carbohydrate diets have not shown any changes in athletic performance.

It must, however, be flagged that they promote adherence, given fewer restrictions. Similar to KD, future research should explore more sport-specific alterations to performance.

Vegetarian diets range from veganism, which is not eating any type of animal or animal by-products, to vegetarianism, which is not eating any animal flesh but consuming eggs and dairy.

There are many benefits in adopting such diets; however, athletes could develop micronutrient deficiencies. In the existing literature, the size of these deficiencies and their impact on performance are unclear.

Intermittent fasting (IF) involves restricted eating at certain hours of the day or fasting for a full day or multiple days at a time. Overall, the risks of IF may outweigh its benefits among athletes. Meeting the caloric intake for muscle mass maintenance and training performance is already difficult for athletes.

It becomes more complicated when the eating window is reduced. The overall results are varied, which requires more research on the impact of IF on performance.

Conclusion

Overall, the MedDiet was seen to have the most extensive research on improvements in performance and diet adherence. It provides adequate nutrition to help athletes recover and continue training.

Low-carbohydrate diets and ketogenic diets may be conflated by many. The former has shown more adherence, but neither has been shown to be detrimental to athletic performance.

Vegans and vegetarians could suffer from micronutrient deficiencies, such as vitamins and minerals, and such diets may have lower leucine content. Plant-based athletes should have higher protein intake compared to omnivore athletes.

In existing research, individuals on plant-based diets have not been seen to report inferior performance. Lastly, IF has been shown to reduce athletic performance levels in both endurance and aerobic sports performance. 

Journal reference:

Adblock test (Why?)



from "nutrition" - Google News https://ift.tt/c2iVm09
via IFTTT

Are Smoothies Healthy? How Blending Affects Nutrients - The New York Times

Q: If I blend fruits and vegetables into a smoothie, do they lose nutrients or fiber?

A freshly blended smoothie ticks a lot of boxes: It’s quick to prepare, easy to consume and a versatile base for whatever fruits and veggies you have on hand.

And if blending your produce can help you eat more of it, that’s a good thing, said Kristina Petersen, an associate professor of nutritional sciences at Pennsylvania State University. According to surveys performed between 2017 and 2018, 86 percent of adults in the United States didn’t get the recommended 4.5 cups of fruits and vegetables each day.

But are nutrients lost when fruits and vegetables are chopped into bits by a blender blade? We asked experts to help us break it down so you can get the most out of your smoothie.

Unlike juicing, blending can incorporate all of the edible parts of fruits and vegetables — including the skin, seeds and pulp — so a smoothie can be nutritionally very similar to eating the produce whole, said Mary Ann Lila, a professor of food, bioprocessing and nutrition sciences at North Carolina State University.

And blending shouldn’t degrade the vitamins or minerals found in fruits and vegetables, Dr. Lila said. Nor will it immediately harm certain antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds, like anthocyanins and flavonols, she said.

Fruits and vegetables are also good sources of fiber, which most of us could benefit from eating more of. And whether you eat an apple whole or as part of a smoothie, “you’ve consumed exactly the same amount of fiber,” said Balazs Bajka, a gut physiologist at King’s College London.

Blending does, however, break the fibers into smaller pieces, which will affect how they move through your digestive system, he said. Some types of fibers, when chopped into bits, may disperse more quickly within your gut and slow digestion and absorption — usually a good thing — others might lose some of the “roughage” effect that keeps things moving in your digestive tract and prevents constipation.

But there’s not much research on this topic, Dr. Bajka said, and specific effects may depend on the person and the fruit or vegetable. Regardless, “eating any kind of fiber is good,” he said.

Processing food often disrupts its natural structure, which can lead to faster digestion and absorption. So it’s reasonable to wonder if puréeing fruit could cause a bigger spike of blood sugar, said Anthony Fardet, a nutrition scientist at the National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment in France.

But in a few small studies that measured adults’ blood sugars after they consumed fruit blended or whole, researchers have found reassuring results. The preparation style of mango, for instance, seemed to make no difference in blood sugar response. And when researchers tested smoothies containing seeded fruits like passion fruit, raspberries or kiwi fruit, participants had more gradual rises in blood sugars than when they ate the same fruits whole.

That result surprised Gail Rees, a senior lecturer in human nutrition at the University of Plymouth in Britain who led two of the studies. She hypothesized that mashing up the fruits’ seeds in the blender might release some fiber, protein and fat, which could slow nutrient absorption and cause a more gradual rise in blood sugars.

That said, liquid meals are generally less satiating than those composed of solid foods, Dr. Fardet said — it’s not clear why this is, but it may result in a desire to consume more, or it may leave you hungry for a snack sooner.

Beyond the fruits and vegetables you use in your smoothies, other ingredients also affect their nutritional value, Dr. Petersen said. Water is a good liquid base if you’re aiming for a light snack. For a more balanced and filling smoothie, low-fat or fat-free dairy milk or unsweetened yogurt, kefir or fortified plant-based milks can provide protein, calcium and vitamin D, she added.

“Throw some nuts in there,” or avocado, Dr. Lila suggested. Both provide healthy fats and fiber, as do chia or flax seeds; whole grains like millet or rolled oats are good fiber sources, too.

Smoothies also provide a great opportunity to use frozen produce, which is generally just as nutritious as when it is fresh, Dr. Lila said. She recommended storing frozen fruits and vegetables at the back of your freezer to minimize the slight thawing and refreezing that can cause nutrient losses when you open your freezer door.

Finally, keep in mind that once fruit is blended, its healthful compounds gradually become less stable, Dr. Lila said. Yesterday’s smoothie that has separated and turned a bit gray has probably lost some of its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory value, she said. For the same reason, prepackaged smoothies may not be as beneficial, she added, and they also often contain added sugars.

In other words, Dr. Lila said, enjoy your smoothie — but make it fresh and drink it right away.

Adblock test (Why?)



from "nutrition" - Google News https://ift.tt/e1gZ7ID
via IFTTT

Monday, August 28, 2023

Melons: Benefits, Nutrition, and Calories - Health.com

Melons are part of the Cucurbitaceae plant family, which includes foods like pumpkins and cucumbers. There are dozens of different types of melons that grow globally, including the gourd-like bitter melon from India and the sweet canary melon grown in Asia and Africa.

Most of the melons eaten in the U.S. are grown domestically, with watermelon, cantaloupe, and honeydew the most commonly consumed varieties.

While each type of melon offers a slightly different nutritional profile, every variety is hydrating and full of antioxidants like vitamin C and beta-carotene. 

Keep reading for four impressive health benefits of melons.  

Melons are excellent sources of antioxidants, naturally occurring molecules that help scavenge harmful compounds in the body called free radicals. Free radicals heighten oxidative stress and damage tissues over time.

A greater intake of antioxidant-rich foods has been associated with a lower risk of developing chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease and cancer.

Plant foods like fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, seeds, and whole grains are all wonderful sources of antioxidants. Melons are no exception. 

Each type of melon delivers a different antioxidant profile. Cantaloupe, for example, is a great source of beta-carotene, a 'provitamin' that gets converted into vitamin A in the body and supports  vision and reproductive health. Just one cup of cantaloupe provides nearly one-third of your daily vitamin A needs.

Watermelon serves up notable antioxidants as well. The summertime staple is rich in lycopene, the same antioxidant that gives foods like tomatoes and grapefruits their vibrant color. While findings have been mixed, some studies report that a higher lycopene intake is associated with lower risk of developing prostate cancer.

About 20% of our hydration needs are actually met through food, not the water we drink. Luckily melons are among the most hydrating fruits around, with varieties like cantaloupe and watermelon clocking in at 90% water by weight. Melons' sky-high water content makes them perfect snacks for hot summer days.

Staying adequately hydrated helps maintain steady energy levels, regular bowel movements, and lubricated, mobile joints. Consuming enough fluids is also important for preventing conditions like kidney stones.

Apart from melons, other water-rich foods include strawberries, cabbage, celery, and spinach.

All three of the most popular types of melon are good sources of vitamin C, another antioxidant. 

Vitamin C in particular supports a healthy immune system by stimulating the production of white blood cells and enhancing their action against foreign invaders. On the flip side, research shows that low levels of vitamin C are associated with a greater susceptibility to illnesses and infection.

What’s more, dietary vitamin C helps the body absorb more non-heme iron from plant-based foods like nuts, seeds, and beans. Since an iron deficiency can also worsen our body’s defenses against invaders, vitamin C bolsters the immune system in more ways than one. 

Fortunately you don’t need to eat an entire melon to keep your immune system on tip top shape: just one cup of cubed cantaloupe fulfills 65% of your daily vitamin C needs.

When it comes to melons, the saying ‘you are what you eat’ might just apply. That’s because both the high vitamin C and water content of melons are critical for healthy, glowing skin. 

Vitamin C assists in the production of the most abundant protein in the body, collagen. Collagen supports skin elasticity and also aids in wound healing. When you get a cut, proteins like collagen are responsible for remodeling the tissue at the wound site. As you age, declining collagen stores contribute to the formation of wrinkles. 

Eating water-rich foods like melon may also help keep skin better hydrated and therefore more supple.  

Melons like cantaloupe are low in calories, but deliver important nutrients like vitamin C and potassium.

One cup of cubed cantaloupe provides:

  • Calories: 54
  • Fat: 0.3 grams (g)
  • Sodium: 25 milligrams (mg)
  • Carbohydrates: 13 g
  • Fiber: 1.4 g
  • Protein: 1.3 g
  • Vitamin C: 58.7 mg or about 65% of the daily value (DV) 
  • Potassium: 427 mg, or about 9% of the DV

For most people, melons are well tolerated, safe for consumption, and full of beneficial nutrients. A few subgroups that may need to avoid or minimize melon consumption include:

  • People diagnosed with melon allergies: Individuals with melon allergies should avoid consuming the fruits entirely to prevent adverse reactions.
  • Some people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): Those diagnosed with IBS may be sensitive to specific classes of carbohydrates that are abbreviated as ‘FODMAPs.' Fruits like watermelon have high amounts of the FODMAPs fructose, mannitol, and fructans. As such, some people who are sensitive to these FODMAPs may experience abdominal pain, gas, or looser stools after eating even moderate quantities of watermelon.
  • People watching their blood sugar: Whole fruits need not be eliminated, even for people diagnosed with insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes. But because melons like watermelon contain a fair amount of natural sugar without any protein or fat, eating a large quantity of the fruit could potentially spike blood glucose levels in some people. Stick with a one-cup serving of melon per sitting and pair the fruit with a source of protein (like plain Greek yogurt) or healthy fat (like almonds) if you're working on stabilizing or lowering your blood sugar levels.

Cantaloupe is notorious for harboring harmful bacteria like Salmonella, so it’s important to wash melons well before eating them. Since melons are grown in the dirt, unwanted bugs can accumulate on their outer surface.

Though you don’t eat the skin of melons, simply cutting through the outer rind can transfer bacteria to the fruit’s inner flesh if the melon hasn’t been sufficiently cleaned before slicing.

To thoroughly clean melons, follow these steps:

  • Run melon under warm water before slicing. There’s no need to use a special solution for cleaning fruits and vegetables. Room temperature water works well.
  • Use a clean fruit and vegetable brush to scrub melon skin well. 

Quality melons will be free from bruises. Watermelons that have yellow areas on their outer rinds are best. That yellow spot is the area where the fruit rested on the ground. Its presence indicates that the watermelon fully ripened out in the field instead of getting shipped prematurely to your grocery store.  

Healthy ways to enjoy melons include:

  • In homemade parfaits with plain Greek yogurt and high-fiber toppings like chia seeds
  • Added to water for a naturally infused beverage 
  • Blended and poured into popsicle molds for low-sugar fruit pops
  • Wrapped in prosciutto or turkey bacon for a savory snack or appetizer  
  • Frozen in chunks and blended with fresh lime juice to make a fruit slushy
  • Tossed with feta cheese, fresh mint, and olive oil for a salty-sweet side salad
  • Skewered with mini mozzarella balls and fresh basil leaves

Melons are hydrating and full of healthy antioxidants, such as beta-carotene in cantaloupe and lycopene in watermelon. They’re also good sources of electrolytes like potassium, as well as vitamin C.

Adding these versatile fruits to your diet can help you stay well nourished and may even lower your risk of developing chronic conditions over time.

Adblock test (Why?)



from "nutrition" - Google News https://ift.tt/KRs3kit
via IFTTT